Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101000110011… |
… | …101110110100 |
3 | 202010111102100 |
4 | 220303232310 |
5 | 10214311102 |
6 | 1021142100 |
7 | 156633330 |
oct | 50635664 |
9 | 22114370 |
10 | 10697652 |
11 | 6047339 |
12 | 36ba930 |
13 | 22a7294 |
14 | 15c67c0 |
15 | e14a1c |
hex | a33bb4 |
10697652 has 36 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 30905056. Its totient is φ = 3056400.
The previous prime is 10697651. The next prime is 10697657. The reversal of 10697652 is 25679601.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (36).
It is a super-2 number, since 2×106976522 = 228879516626208, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10697651) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 20974 + ... + 21477.
Almost surely, 210697652 is an apocalyptic number.
10697652 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
10697652 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (20207404).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
10697652 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10697652 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 42468 (or 42463 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 22680, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 10697652 is about 3270.7265247954. The cubic root of 10697652 is about 220.3414257780.
The spelling of 10697652 in words is "ten million, six hundred ninety-seven thousand, six hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •