Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100111111100… |
… | …11011000010100 |
3 | 21121002210011220 |
4 | 12133303120110 |
5 | 210401001322 |
6 | 14452130340 |
7 | 2462325606 |
oct | 637633024 |
9 | 247083156 |
10 | 109000212 |
11 | 56589522 |
12 | 306069b0 |
13 | 19775289 |
14 | 10695176 |
15 | 988155c |
hex | 67f3614 |
109000212 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 263104800. Its totient is φ = 35080416.
The previous prime is 109000189. The next prime is 109000231. The reversal of 109000212 is 212000901.
It is a happy number.
109000212 is digitally balanced in base 9, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
109000212 is strictly pandigital in base 9.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 109000191 and 109000200.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 156262 + ... + 156957.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (10962700).
Almost surely, 2109000212 is an apocalyptic number.
109000212 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
109000212 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (154104588).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
109000212 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
109000212 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 313255 (or 313253 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 36, while the sum is 15.
The square root of 109000212 is about 10440.3166618642. The cubic root of 109000212 is about 477.6859277955.
The spelling of 109000212 in words is "one hundred nine million, two hundred twelve", and thus it is an aban number.
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.085 sec. • engine limits •