Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100011010110101111… |
… | …0111001000010110001 |
3 | 21020222100021122101201 |
4 | 1012231132321002301 |
5 | 2220443300002434 |
6 | 54513544131201 |
7 | 5325330566131 |
oct | 1065536710261 |
9 | 236870248351 |
10 | 75925000369 |
11 | 2a221757599 |
12 | 1286b166b01 |
13 | 720cb1402a |
14 | 39638a0ac1 |
15 | 1e95881614 |
hex | 11ad7b90b1 |
75925000369 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 87483052800. Its totient is φ = 65548320768.
The previous prime is 75925000343. The next prime is 75925000373. The reversal of 75925000369 is 96300052957.
It is a happy number.
It is a 5-Lehmer number, since φ(75925000369) divides (75925000369-1)5.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 75925000369 - 25 = 75925000337 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×759250003692 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (75925000339) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 63 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 225296569 + ... + 225296905.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1366922700).
It is a Poulet number, since it divides 275925000368-1.
Almost surely, 275925000369 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
75925000369 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (11558052431).
75925000369 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
75925000369 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 722.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 510300, while the sum is 46.
The spelling of 75925000369 in words is "seventy-five billion, nine hundred twenty-five million, three hundred sixty-nine", and thus it is an aban number.
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.064 sec. • engine limits •