Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010000100000110… |
… | …11000110000101000 |
3 | 221000212201110211100 |
4 | 21002003120300220 |
5 | 124330204244241 |
6 | 4242200201400 |
7 | 462220435350 |
oct | 110203306050 |
9 | 27025643740 |
10 | 9698118696 |
11 | 4127376132 |
12 | 1a67a69260 |
13 | bb72b1296 |
14 | 68001db60 |
15 | 3bb62b9b6 |
hex | 2420d8c28 |
9698118696 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 30017988000. Its totient is φ = 2770890912.
The previous prime is 9698118671. The next prime is 9698118767. The reversal of 9698118696 is 6968118969.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (63).
It is a nude number because it is divisible by every one of its digits.
9698118696 is a strobogrammatic number because it is the same when read upside-down.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 9620646 + ... + 9621653.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (625374750).
Almost surely, 29698118696 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
9698118696 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (20319869304).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
9698118696 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9698118696 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 19242318 (or 19242311 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 10077696, while the sum is 63.
The square root of 9698118696 is about 98479.0266808116. The cubic root of 9698118696 is about 2132.5333502021.
The spelling of 9698118696 in words is "nine billion, six hundred ninety-eight million, one hundred eighteen thousand, six hundred ninety-six".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.092 sec. • engine limits •