Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100100011001000… |
… | …1010111101011001 |
3 | 22200202121101000111 |
4 | 3020302022331121 |
5 | 23344330022124 |
6 | 1314132404321 |
7 | 146322405343 |
oct | 31062127531 |
9 | 8622541014 |
10 | 3368595289 |
11 | 1479536554 |
12 | 7a01766a1 |
13 | 418b7b667 |
14 | 23d554293 |
15 | 14ab02494 |
hex | c8c8af59 |
3368595289 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3368595290. Its totient is φ = 3368595288.
The previous prime is 3368595281. The next prime is 3368595317. The reversal of 3368595289 is 9825958633.
3368595289 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a weak prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 3364928064 + 3667225 = 58008^2 + 1915^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 3368595289 - 23 = 3368595281 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×33685952892 = 22694868442145987042, which contains 22 as substring.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3368595281) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1684297644 + 1684297645.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1684297645).
Almost surely, 23368595289 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
3368595289 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
3368595289 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
3368595289 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The product of its digits is 13996800, while the sum is 58.
The square root of 3368595289 is about 58039.6010410134. The cubic root of 3368595289 is about 1499.0505530864.
The spelling of 3368595289 in words is "three billion, three hundred sixty-eight million, five hundred ninety-five thousand, two hundred eighty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.098 sec. • engine limits •