Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1010100110011… |
… | …01100011110000 |
3 | 20012022201112110 |
4 | 11103031203300 |
5 | 140231003402 |
6 | 12453525320 |
7 | 2126553561 |
oct | 523154360 |
9 | 205281473 |
10 | 88922352 |
11 | 46215752 |
12 | 25943840 |
13 | 1556559c |
14 | bb4a168 |
15 | 7c1756c |
hex | 54cd8f0 |
88922352 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 239984640. Its totient is φ = 28336896.
The previous prime is 88922329. The next prime is 88922369. The reversal of 88922352 is 25322988.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 88922352.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 176533 + ... + 177035.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2999808).
Almost surely, 288922352 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 88922352, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (119992320).
88922352 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (151062288).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
88922352 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
88922352 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 670 (or 664 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 69120, while the sum is 39.
The square root of 88922352 is about 9429.8648982899. The cubic root of 88922352 is about 446.3446296349.
The spelling of 88922352 in words is "eighty-eight million, nine hundred twenty-two thousand, three hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.077 sec. • engine limits •