Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100011010000… |
… | …001100011100 |
3 | 122101111210001 |
4 | 203100030130 |
5 | 4331210442 |
6 | 530024044 |
7 | 141356530 |
oct | 43201434 |
9 | 18344701 |
10 | 9241372 |
11 | 52421a8 |
12 | 3118024 |
13 | 1bb748a |
14 | 1327bc0 |
15 | c282b7 |
hex | 8d031c |
9241372 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 20160000. Its totient is φ = 3616704.
The previous prime is 9241369. The next prime is 9241373. The reversal of 9241372 is 2731429.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (28).
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 9241372.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (9241373) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 15129 + ... + 15727.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (420000).
Almost surely, 29241372 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 9241372, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (10080000).
9241372 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (10918628).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
9241372 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9241372 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 658 (or 656 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 3024, while the sum is 28.
The square root of 9241372 is about 3039.9624997687. The cubic root of 9241372 is about 209.8515352755.
The spelling of 9241372 in words is "nine million, two hundred forty-one thousand, three hundred seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.084 sec. • engine limits •