332413321 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 335704644. Its totient is φ = 329122000.

The previous prime is 332413313. The next prime is 332413373. The reversal of 332413321 is 123314233.

It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 328153225 + 4260096 = 18115^2 + 2064^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 332413321 - 2³ = 332413313 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×332413321² = 220997231956498082, which contains 22 as substring.

It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (22) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors. Since it is squarefree, it is also a hoax number.

It is a Duffinian number.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 332413292 and 332413301.

It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (332413391) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1645510 + ... + 1645711.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (83926161).

Almost surely, 2^332413321 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

332413321 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (3291323).

332413321 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.

332413321 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The sum of its prime factors is 3291322.

The product of its digits is 1296, while the sum is 22.

The square root of 332413321 is about 18232.2055988846. The cubic root of 332413321 is about 692.7227856485.

Adding to 332413321 its reverse (123314233), we get a palindrome (455727554).

The spelling of 332413321 in words is "three hundred thirty-two million, four hundred thirteen thousand, three hundred twenty-one".