Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101001101101111000… |
… | …000000010101111001 |
3 | 11021121201001202210111 |
4 | 221231320000111321 |
5 | 1213214011232334 |
6 | 32324434544321 |
7 | 3144004551433 |
oct | 515570002571 |
9 | 137551052714 |
10 | 44793070969 |
11 | 17aa6580219 |
12 | 88211380a1 |
13 | 42bb09c02a |
14 | 224cda5653 |
15 | 12726b6064 |
hex | a6de00579 |
44793070969 has 6 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 47274681930. Its totient is φ = 42435540576.
The previous prime is 44793070967. The next prime is 44793071023. The reversal of 44793070969 is 96907039744.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 44695456569 + 97614400 = 211413^2 + 9880^2 .
It is not a de Polignac number, because 44793070969 - 21 = 44793070967 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×447930709692 (a number of 22 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (44793070967) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 5 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 62039904 + ... + 62040625.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (7879113655).
Almost surely, 244793070969 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
44793070969 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (2481610961).
44793070969 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
44793070969 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 124080567 (or 124080548 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 10287648, while the sum is 58.
The spelling of 44793070969 in words is "forty-four billion, seven hundred ninety-three million, seventy thousand, nine hundred sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •