Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11101011111010… |
… | …111101111011001 |
3 | 1021110222120012102 |
4 | 131133113233121 |
5 | 2003124403334 |
6 | 121032253145 |
7 | 15155262431 |
oct | 3537275731 |
9 | 1243876172 |
10 | 494762969 |
11 | 23430a818 |
12 | 1198411b5 |
13 | 7b67046c |
14 | 499d12c1 |
15 | 2d68167e |
hex | 1d7d7bd9 |
494762969 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 495127860. Its totient is φ = 494398080.
The previous prime is 494762963. The next prime is 494762987. The reversal of 494762969 is 969267494.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 104305369 + 390457600 = 10213^2 + 19760^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 494762969 - 220 = 493714393 is a prime.
It is a super-3 number, since 3×4947629693 (a number of 27 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (494762963) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 180404 + ... + 183125.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (123781965).
Almost surely, 2494762969 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
494762969 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (364891).
494762969 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
494762969 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 364890.
The product of its digits is 5878656, while the sum is 56.
The square root of 494762969 is about 22243.2679478533. The cubic root of 494762969 is about 790.9197049301.
The spelling of 494762969 in words is "four hundred ninety-four million, seven hundred sixty-two thousand, nine hundred sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.085 sec. • engine limits •