Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1111100011010… |
… | …1000000011011 |
3 | 11112201222010111 |
4 | 3320311000123 |
5 | 113144310302 |
6 | 10250025151 |
7 | 1421302336 |
oct | 370650033 |
9 | 145658114 |
10 | 65228827 |
11 | 33902424 |
12 | 19a181b7 |
13 | 1068ac51 |
14 | 893d61d |
15 | 5ad70d7 |
hex | 3e3501b |
65228827 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 66955392. Its totient is φ = 63508800.
The previous prime is 65228797. The next prime is 65228831. The reversal of 65228827 is 72882256.
65228827 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 65228827 - 211 = 65226779 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 65228827.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (65228857) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 23577 + ... + 26197.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (8369424).
Almost surely, 265228827 is an apocalyptic number.
65228827 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1726565).
65228827 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
65228827 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 3269.
The product of its digits is 107520, while the sum is 40.
The square root of 65228827 is about 8076.4365285688. The cubic root of 65228827 is about 402.5438440981.
The spelling of 65228827 in words is "sixty-five million, two hundred twenty-eight thousand, eight hundred twenty-seven".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •