Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11011111101110001101… |
… | …00001100011010000001 |
3 | 10101212012021020002012220 |
4 | 31332320310030122001 |
5 | 111220334332201212 |
6 | 2013231010441253 |
7 | 126264314420415 |
oct | 15767064143201 |
9 | 3355167202186 |
10 | 960878397057 |
11 | 340562894637 |
12 | 136284293229 |
13 | 6c7c21b7a67 |
14 | 347147b0d45 |
15 | 19edbe4038c |
hex | dfb8d0c681 |
960878397057 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1286836266240. Its totient is φ = 637753370112.
The previous prime is 960878397029. The next prime is 960878397091. The reversal of 960878397057 is 750793878069.
960878397057 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 960878397057 - 212 = 960878392961 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×9608783970572 (a number of 25 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 960878396982 and 960878397000.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (960878390057) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 20664408 + ... + 20710854.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (80427266640).
Almost surely, 2960878397057 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
960878397057 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (325957869183).
960878397057 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
960878397057 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 76792.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 160030080, while the sum is 69.
The spelling of 960878397057 in words is "nine hundred sixty billion, eight hundred seventy-eight million, three hundred ninety-seven thousand, fifty-seven".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •