Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10110000010110000101101… |
… | …100110000101101110101001 |
3 | 110201021000112212022201120011 |
4 | 112002300231212011232221 |
5 | 100201333434242434334 |
6 | 542104421350131521 |
7 | 26264113153641202 |
oct | 2602605546055651 |
9 | 421230485281504 |
10 | 96946766764969 |
11 | 28987990495090 |
12 | aa58b24050ba1 |
13 | 421306ba6c204 |
14 | 19d236a02c5a9 |
15 | b31c1b920564 |
hex | 582c2d985ba9 |
96946766764969 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 105776044204608. Its totient is φ = 88120145159760.
The previous prime is 96946766764933. The next prime is 96946766764979.
96946766764969 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 96946766764969 - 211 = 96946766762921 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×969467667649692 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (96946766764979) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 663882277 + ... + 664028290.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (13222005525576).
Almost surely, 296946766764969 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
96946766764969 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (8829277439639).
96946766764969 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
96946766764969 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 1327917215.
The product of its digits is 239990252544, while the sum is 94.
The spelling of 96946766764969 in words is "ninety-six trillion, nine hundred forty-six billion, seven hundred sixty-six million, seven hundred sixty-four thousand, nine hundred sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.079 sec. • engine limits •