Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010010010111000… |
… | …10101101001111001 |
3 | 221100112000101022210 |
4 | 21021130111221321 |
5 | 130103424200324 |
6 | 4302345405333 |
7 | 465254321214 |
oct | 111134255171 |
9 | 27315011283 |
10 | 9822100089 |
11 | 419035719a |
12 | 1aa1499849 |
13 | c06ba0459 |
14 | 69269477b |
15 | 3c746bd29 |
hex | 249715a79 |
9822100089 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 13097450080. Its totient is φ = 6547408416.
The previous prime is 9822100069. The next prime is 9822100163. The reversal of 9822100089 is 9800012289.
9822100089 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 9822100089 - 212 = 9822095993 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (9822100019) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 128644 + ... + 190245.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1637181260).
Almost surely, 29822100089 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
9822100089 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (3275349991).
9822100089 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9822100089 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 329159.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 20736, while the sum is 39.
The square root of 9822100089 is about 99106.5088124892. The cubic root of 9822100089 is about 2141.5823805441.
The spelling of 9822100089 in words is "nine billion, eight hundred twenty-two million, one hundred thousand, eighty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.075 sec. • engine limits •