Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010100100011000… |
… | …01010101101001011 |
3 | 221201202011100102120 |
4 | 21102030022231023 |
5 | 130404011342013 |
6 | 4325111102323 |
7 | 502015606530 |
oct | 112214125513 |
9 | 27652140376 |
10 | 9968855883 |
11 | 4256182a78 |
12 | 1b226719a3 |
13 | c2b4047bc |
14 | 6a7d76d87 |
15 | 3d52aa123 |
hex | 25230ab4b |
9968855883 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 15190637568. Its totient is φ = 5696489064.
The previous prime is 9968855857. The next prime is 9968855909. The reversal of 9968855883 is 3885588699.
9968855883 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (9968855857) and next prime (9968855909).
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 9968855883 - 222 = 9964661579 is a prime.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (9968855803) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 237353691 + ... + 237353732.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1898829696).
Almost surely, 29968855883 is an apocalyptic number.
9968855883 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (5221781685).
9968855883 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9968855883 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 474707433.
The product of its digits is 149299200, while the sum is 69.
The square root of 9968855883 is about 99844.1579813261. The cubic root of 9968855883 is about 2152.1957652410.
The spelling of 9968855883 in words is "nine billion, nine hundred sixty-eight million, eight hundred fifty-five thousand, eight hundred eighty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •