Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011001111110100… |
… | …00101000101011111 |
3 | 222200010202121110110 |
4 | 21213322011011133 |
5 | 132130300304043 |
6 | 4425204341103 |
7 | 514031601330 |
oct | 114772050537 |
9 | 28603677413 |
10 | 10333213023 |
11 | 4422913981 |
12 | 20046a4793 |
13 | c88a46843 |
14 | 700500287 |
15 | 40727cb33 |
hex | 267e8515f |
10333213023 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 16581091840. Its totient is φ = 5591721600.
The previous prime is 10333212991. The next prime is 10333213049. The reversal of 10333213023 is 32031233301.
10333213023 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 10333213023 - 25 = 10333212991 is a prime.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (21).
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10333213063) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2023173 + ... + 2028273.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (518159120).
Almost surely, 210333213023 is an apocalyptic number.
10333213023 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (6247878817).
10333213023 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10333213023 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 10207.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 972, while the sum is 21.
Adding to 10333213023 its reverse (32031233301), we get a palindrome (42364446324).
The spelling of 10333213023 in words is "ten billion, three hundred thirty-three million, two hundred thirteen thousand, twenty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.087 sec. • engine limits •