Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11110001000100100001… |
… | …00010110111111100001 |
3 | 10122222112010102110010020 |
4 | 33010102010112333201 |
5 | 113430434401012402 |
6 | 2111352434224053 |
7 | 134542635631215 |
oct | 17042204267741 |
9 | 3588463373106 |
10 | 1035390250977 |
11 | 36a1198932a5 |
12 | 1487ba125029 |
13 | 768382c9554 |
14 | 381826da945 |
15 | 1bded6d18bc |
hex | f112116fe1 |
1035390250977 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1461897823680. Its totient is φ = 649580890112.
The previous prime is 1035390250963. The next prime is 1035390250981. The reversal of 1035390250977 is 7790520935301.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 1035390250977 - 211 = 1035390248929 is a prime.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (51).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (1035390250577) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 740043 + ... + 1618160.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (91368613980).
Almost surely, 21035390250977 is an apocalyptic number.
1035390250977 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (17) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
1035390250977 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (426507572703).
1035390250977 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1035390250977 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2366832.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1786050, while the sum is 51.
The spelling of 1035390250977 in words is "one trillion, thirty-five billion, three hundred ninety million, two hundred fifty thousand, nine hundred seventy-seven".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •