Search a number
-
+
104322243323041 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10111101110000101101010…
…010000010110010010100001
3111200101002221111200010220021
4113232011222100112102201
5102133203423242314131
61005512551005313441
730655014304202242
oct2756055220262241
9450332844603807
10104322243323041
11302708a6753947
12b84a424265881
134629712137793
141ba931b492cc9
15c0d9daacce11
hex5ee16a4164a1

104322243323041 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 104322243323042. Its totient is φ = 104322243323040.

The previous prime is 104322243323027. The next prime is 104322243323167. The reversal of 104322243323041 is 140323342223401.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 84943503590400 + 19378739732641 = 9216480^2 + 4402129^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 104322243323041 - 25 = 104322243323009 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 104322243322988 and 104322243323006.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (104322243323741) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 52161121661520 + 52161121661521.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (52161121661521).

Almost surely, 2104322243323041 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

104322243323041 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

104322243323041 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

104322243323041 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 82944, while the sum is 34.

Adding to 104322243323041 its reverse (140323342223401), we get a palindrome (244645585546442).

The spelling of 104322243323041 in words is "one hundred four trillion, three hundred twenty-two billion, two hundred forty-three million, three hundred twenty-three thousand, forty-one".