Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110001100001000100… |
… | …1011010100011001100 |
3 | 101011110202211000110110 |
4 | 1203002021122203030 |
5 | 3220234113304202 |
6 | 120503355240020 |
7 | 10453055010501 |
oct | 1430211324314 |
9 | 334422730413 |
10 | 106336463052 |
11 | 41108185626 |
12 | 18737a49010 |
13 | a048501c71 |
14 | 520a8154a8 |
15 | 2b7568526c |
hex | 18c225a8cc |
106336463052 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 257287161600. Its totient is φ = 34141504320.
The previous prime is 106336462961. The next prime is 106336463053. The reversal of 106336463052 is 250364633601.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1063364630522 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 106336463052.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (106336463053) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 218824 + ... + 510447.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5360149200).
Almost surely, 2106336463052 is an apocalyptic number.
106336463052 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
106336463052 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (150950698548).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
106336463052 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
106336463052 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 729726 (or 729724 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 233280, while the sum is 39.
The spelling of 106336463052 in words is "one hundred six billion, three hundred thirty-six million, four hundred sixty-three thousand, fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •