Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110010111011001010… |
… | …1111111110011011001 |
3 | 101110021110111100101000 |
4 | 1211312111333303121 |
5 | 3242432033111444 |
6 | 122123353015213 |
7 | 10621014526500 |
oct | 1456625776331 |
9 | 343243440330 |
10 | 109359660249 |
11 | 4241974a404 |
12 | 192403b4509 |
13 | a40a948c48 |
14 | 5416139837 |
15 | 2ca0cac469 |
hex | 197657fcd9 |
109359660249 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 189949900800. Its totient is φ = 61999082208.
The previous prime is 109359660227. The next prime is 109359660253. The reversal of 109359660249 is 942066953901.
109359660249 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 0 + 9 + 3 + 596 + 6 + 0 + 2 + 49 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 109359660249 - 27 = 109359660121 is a prime.
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (54) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 109359660195 and 109359660204.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (109359660749) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 157414 + ... + 493455.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3957289600).
Almost surely, 2109359660249 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
109359660249 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (80590240551).
109359660249 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
109359660249 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 651019 (or 651006 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3149280, while the sum is 54.
The spelling of 109359660249 in words is "one hundred nine billion, three hundred fifty-nine million, six hundred sixty thousand, two hundred forty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.077 sec. • engine limits •