Search a number
-
+
123565535063161 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11100000110000111010111…
…110100101110110001111001
3121012111202020121001011121121
4130012013113310232301321
5112143444203434010121
61114445120111305241
735012213102153662
oct3406072764566171
9535452217034547
10123565535063161
113640a938218304
1211a379b381b221
1353c42454a3c09
142272864bc2369
15e44353129141
hex7061d7d2ec79

123565535063161 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 123565535063162. Its totient is φ = 123565535063160.

The previous prime is 123565535063153. The next prime is 123565535063203. The reversal of 123565535063161 is 161360535565321.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 64021841863225 + 59543693199936 = 8001365^2 + 7716456^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (161360535565321) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 123565535063161 - 23 = 123565535063153 is a prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 123565535063099 and 123565535063108.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (123565535063261) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 61782767531580 + 61782767531581.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (61782767531581).

Almost surely, 2123565535063161 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

123565535063161 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

123565535063161 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

123565535063161 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 7290000, while the sum is 52.

The spelling of 123565535063161 in words is "one hundred twenty-three trillion, five hundred sixty-five billion, five hundred thirty-five million, sixty-three thousand, one hundred sixty-one".