Search a number
-
+
201102311200001 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101101101110011011000111…
…110100101001010100000001
3222101001012012211121221200012
4231232123013310221110001
5202324330013131400001
61551413043144034305
760234106513031501
oct5556330764512401
9871035184557605
10201102311200001
1159094013a45092
121a67ab85162995
138829b35b31103
143793592033a01
15183b1ec8c52bb
hexb6e6c7d29501

201102311200001 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 201102311200002. Its totient is φ = 201102311200000.

The previous prime is 201102311199997. The next prime is 201102311200013. The reversal of 201102311200001 is 100002113201102.

201102311200001 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 199160257132225 + 1942054067776 = 14112415^2 + 1393576^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 201102311200001 - 22 = 201102311199997 is a prime.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (201102311205001) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 100551155600000 + 100551155600001.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (100551155600001).

Almost surely, 2201102311200001 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

201102311200001 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

201102311200001 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

201102311200001 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 24, while the sum is 14.

Adding to 201102311200001 its reverse (100002113201102), we get a palindrome (301104424401103).

The spelling of 201102311200001 in words is "two hundred one trillion, one hundred two billion, three hundred eleven million, two hundred thousand, one".