Search a number
-
+
220231103021081 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110010000100110010001100…
…101010100000000000011001
31001212202212222020012102120022
4302010302030222200000121
5212331231244333133311
62100220434431240225
764250113015530245
oct6204621452400031
91055685866172508
10220231103021081
1164199539273689
122084a31a979075
1395b691c624969
143c55356a95425
151a6dab2c545db
hexc84c8caa0019

220231103021081 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 220231103021082. Its totient is φ = 220231103021080.

The previous prime is 220231103021003. The next prime is 220231103021087. The reversal of 220231103021081 is 180120301132022.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 178135869030025 + 42095233991056 = 13346755^2 + 6488084^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 220231103021081 - 210 = 220231103020057 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×2202311030210812 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 220231103021081.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (220231103021087) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 110115551510540 + 110115551510541.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (110115551510541).

Almost surely, 2220231103021081 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

220231103021081 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

220231103021081 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

220231103021081 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1152, while the sum is 26.

The spelling of 220231103021081 in words is "two hundred twenty trillion, two hundred thirty-one billion, one hundred three million, twenty-one thousand, eighty-one".