Search a number
-
+
265729443841 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1111011101111010110…
…1011000100000000001
3221101220010211101122101
43313132231120200001
513323203214200331
6322024024110401
725125011001421
oct3673655304001
9841803741571
10265729443841
11a2771386214
1243600305401
131c09aa86104
14cc0b876481
156da3bba061
hex3ddeb58801

265729443841 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 265729443842. Its totient is φ = 265729443840.

The previous prime is 265729443829. The next prime is 265729443877. The reversal of 265729443841 is 148344927562.

265729443841 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 156654473616 + 109074970225 = 395796^2 + 330265^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-265729443841 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×2657294438412 (a number of 24 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (265729443641) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 132864721920 + 132864721921.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (132864721921).

Almost surely, 2265729443841 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

265729443841 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

265729443841 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

265729443841 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 11612160, while the sum is 55.

The spelling of 265729443841 in words is "two hundred sixty-five billion, seven hundred twenty-nine million, four hundred forty-three thousand, eight hundred forty-one".