Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11011111101011101… |
… | …010001001111101000 |
3 | 2212111021220022122200 |
4 | 123331131101033220 |
5 | 442441130042412 |
6 | 21443022020200 |
7 | 2111655513000 |
oct | 337535211750 |
9 | 85437808580 |
10 | 30022112232 |
11 | 11806777302 |
12 | 599a417660 |
13 | 2aa5b37a68 |
14 | 164b363000 |
15 | baaa459dc |
hex | 6fd7513e8 |
30022112232 has 192 divisors, whose sum is σ = 94994640000. Its totient is φ = 8562145536.
The previous prime is 30022112179. The next prime is 30022112257. The reversal of 30022112232 is 23221122003.
30022112232 is a `hidden beast` number, since 300 + 22 + 112 + 232 = 666.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (18).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 25164628 + ... + 25165820.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (494763750).
Almost surely, 230022112232 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 30022112232, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (47497320000).
30022112232 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (64972527768).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
30022112232 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
30022112232 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2245 (or 2224 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 288, while the sum is 18.
Adding to 30022112232 its reverse (23221122003), we get a palindrome (53243234235).
The spelling of 30022112232 in words is "thirty billion, twenty-two million, one hundred twelve thousand, two hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.076 sec. • engine limits •