Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101100000111000011101… |
… | …000001011001100010010 |
3 | 101201210010220121112001000 |
4 | 230013003220023030102 |
5 | 344130431403014102 |
6 | 10240310225122430 |
7 | 431666543103042 |
oct | 54070350131422 |
9 | 11653126545030 |
10 | 3031234032402 |
11 | a695a26505a4 |
12 | 40b582189416 |
13 | 18cac8773994 |
14 | a69d91ad722 |
15 | 53cb187c01c |
hex | 2c1c3a0b312 |
3031234032402 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 6736075627680. Its totient is φ = 1010411344116.
The previous prime is 3031234032371. The next prime is 3031234032419. The reversal of 3031234032402 is 2042304321303.
3031234032402 is a `hidden beast` number, since 3 + 0 + 3 + 12 + 3 + 403 + 240 + 2 = 666.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (27).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 28066981728 + ... + 28066981835.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (421004726730).
Almost surely, 23031234032402 is an apocalyptic number.
3031234032402 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (3704841595278).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
3031234032402 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3031234032402 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 56133963574 (or 56133963568 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 10368, while the sum is 27.
Adding to 3031234032402 its reverse (2042304321303), we get a palindrome (5073538353705).
The spelling of 3031234032402 in words is "three trillion, thirty-one billion, two hundred thirty-four million, thirty-two thousand, four hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.076 sec. • engine limits •