Search a number
-
+
321121231332001 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100100100000011101101110…
…0111011000110001010100001
31120002222220000201222021110021
41021000323130323012022201
5314042222240210111001
63054545020201033441
7124432146316545442
oct11100733473061241
91502886021867407
10321121231332001
1193356827523521
1230023542785881
1310a247a9cb3259
1459424c9bab2c9
15271d17808aba1
hex1240edcec62a1

321121231332001 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 321121231332002. Its totient is φ = 321121231332000.

The previous prime is 321121231331993. The next prime is 321121231332049. The reversal of 321121231332001 is 100233132121123.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 212049630581776 + 109071600750225 = 14561924^2 + 10443735^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (100233132121123) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 321121231332001 - 23 = 321121231331993 is a prime.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (321121231332071) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 160560615666000 + 160560615666001.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (160560615666001).

Almost surely, 2321121231332001 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

321121231332001 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

321121231332001 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

321121231332001 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1296, while the sum is 25.

Adding to 321121231332001 its reverse (100233132121123), we get a palindrome (421354363453124).

The spelling of 321121231332001 in words is "three hundred twenty-one trillion, one hundred twenty-one billion, two hundred thirty-one million, three hundred thirty-two thousand, one".