Search a number
-
+
321203340200441 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100100100001000011111101…
…0111111100100100111111001
31120010021201222001021222002202
41021002013322333210213321
5314100043420042403231
63055050435531035545
7124441114126451516
oct11102077277444771
91503251861258082
10321203340200441
1193388631875686
123003743889bbb5
1310a2c463cbc6ca
145946478a6030d
1527203817745cb
hex12421fafe49f9

321203340200441 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 321203340200442. Its totient is φ = 321203340200440.

The previous prime is 321203340200437. The next prime is 321203340200459. The reversal of 321203340200441 is 144002043302123.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 219724412194816 + 101478928005625 = 14823104^2 + 10073675^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (144002043302123) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 321203340200441 - 22 = 321203340200437 is a prime.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (321203340200471) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 160601670100220 + 160601670100221.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (160601670100221).

Almost surely, 2321203340200441 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

321203340200441 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

321203340200441 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

321203340200441 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 13824, while the sum is 29.

Adding to 321203340200441 its reverse (144002043302123), we get a palindrome (465205383502564).

The spelling of 321203340200441 in words is "three hundred twenty-one trillion, two hundred three billion, three hundred forty million, two hundred thousand, four hundred forty-one".