Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001100011110011001… |
… | …11110100101101101010 |
3 | 1011101210210200001220000 |
4 | 10301321213310231222 |
5 | 20340140221402122 |
6 | 410520322443430 |
7 | 32505331624161 |
oct | 4617147645552 |
9 | 1141723601800 |
10 | 328457997162 |
11 | 117330a81819 |
12 | 537a7b03576 |
13 | 24c868b6399 |
14 | 11c7c8723d8 |
15 | 8825c430ac |
hex | 4c799f4b6a |
328457997162 has 40 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 740100952800. Its totient is φ = 108874335816.
The previous prime is 328457997113. The next prime is 328457997163. The reversal of 328457997162 is 261799754823.
328457997162 is a `hidden beast` number, since 3 + 28 + 457 + 99 + 71 + 6 + 2 = 666.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (63) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 328457997162.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (328457997163) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 19 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 5634462 + ... + 5692457.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (18502523820).
Almost surely, 2328457997162 is an apocalyptic number.
328457997162 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (411642955638).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
328457997162 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
328457997162 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 11327112 (or 11327103 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 45722880, while the sum is 63.
The spelling of 328457997162 in words is "three hundred twenty-eight billion, four hundred fifty-seven million, nine hundred ninety-seven thousand, one hundred sixty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •