Search a number
-
+
334963716361 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1001101111111010110…
…01001011000100001001
31012000121012022211212221
410313331121023010021
520442001202410421
6413514042534041
733125466416431
oct4677531130411
91160535284787
10334963716361
1111a06a31595a
1254b02807321
132578268a481
14122d88c52c1
158aa6e73841
hex4dfd64b109

334963716361 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 334963716362. Its totient is φ = 334963716360.

The previous prime is 334963716319. The next prime is 334963716421. The reversal of 334963716361 is 163617369433.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 192079716361 + 142884000000 = 438269^2 + 378000^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 334963716361 - 27 = 334963716233 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×3349637163612 (a number of 24 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is the 578761-st Hogben number.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 334963716299 and 334963716308.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (334963716761) by changing a digit.

It is a nontrivial repunit in base 578760.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 167481858180 + 167481858181.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (167481858181).

Almost surely, 2334963716361 is an apocalyptic number.

334963716361 is the 309361-st centered heptagonal number.

It is an amenable number.

334963716361 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

334963716361 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

334963716361 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its digits is 4408992, while the sum is 52.

The spelling of 334963716361 in words is "three hundred thirty-four billion, nine hundred sixty-three million, seven hundred sixteen thousand, three hundred sixty-one".