Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10110010011011100110101… |
… | …11111111011111001010001 |
3 | 20102122211110001102011201000 |
4 | 23021232122333323321101 |
5 | 22412040402443122224 |
6 | 252151445323132213 |
7 | 13221342135222651 |
oct | 1311563277737121 |
9 | 212584401364630 |
10 | 49046832004689 |
11 | 1469a710022502 |
12 | 5601730974069 |
13 | 214a133a82c1c |
14 | c17c44c78361 |
15 | 5a0c49ab30c9 |
hex | 2c9b9affbe51 |
49046832004689 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 75005907965440. Its totient is φ = 31643117421840.
The previous prime is 49046832004673. The next prime is 49046832004733. The reversal of 49046832004689 is 98640023864094.
49046832004689 is a `hidden beast` number, since 4 + 90 + 4 + 6 + 83 + 2 + 0 + 0 + 468 + 9 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 49046832004689 - 24 = 49046832004673 is a prime.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (49046832004669) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (29) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 29299181962 + ... + 29299183635.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (4687869247840).
Almost surely, 249046832004689 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
49046832004689 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (25959075960751).
49046832004689 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
49046832004689 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 58598365637 (or 58598365631 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 71663616, while the sum is 63.
The spelling of 49046832004689 in words is "forty-nine trillion, forty-six billion, eight hundred thirty-two million, four thousand, six hundred eighty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.065 sec. • engine limits •