Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101000000000100100111… |
… | …0001010100111010010001 |
3 | 201110200100112102110112000 |
4 | 1100001021301110322101 |
5 | 1210043013211300403 |
6 | 15410040101424213 |
7 | 1105163200106043 |
oct | 120011161247221 |
9 | 21420315373460 |
10 | 5498795806353 |
11 | 18300319744a3 |
12 | 74985370b069 |
13 | 30b6c38acb05 |
14 | 150200aa7a93 |
15 | 9808278b7a3 |
hex | 50049c54e91 |
5498795806353 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 8249482694400. Its totient is φ = 3619460529360.
The previous prime is 5498795806349. The next prime is 5498795806369. The reversal of 5498795806353 is 3536085978945.
5498795806353 is a `hidden beast` number, since 5 + 4 + 9 + 8 + 7 + 9 + 580 + 6 + 35 + 3 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 5498795806353 - 22 = 5498795806349 is a prime.
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (72) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (5498795806753) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1288979538 + ... + 1288983803.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (515592668400).
Almost surely, 25498795806353 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
5498795806353 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (2750686888047).
5498795806353 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5498795806353 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 2577963429 (or 2577963423 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 979776000, while the sum is 72.
The spelling of 5498795806353 in words is "five trillion, four hundred ninety-eight billion, seven hundred ninety-five million, eight hundred six thousand, three hundred fifty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.077 sec. • engine limits •