5732849601 has 40 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 9004650600. Its totient is φ = 3629525760.

The previous prime is 5732849579. The next prime is 5732849621. The reversal of 5732849601 is 1069482375.

5732849601 is a `hidden beast` number, since 5 + 7 + 32 + 8 + 4 + 9 + 601 = 666.

5732849601 is digitally balanced in base 10, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 4 ways, for example, as 1225070001 + 4507779600 = 35001^2 + 67140^2 .

It is not a de Polignac number, because 5732849601 - 2¹³ = 5732841409 is a prime.

5732849601 is strictly pandigital in base 10.

It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (5732849621) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written in 39 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 123285 + ... + 163293.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (225116265).

It is a 1-persistent number, because it is pandigital, but 2⋅5732849601 = 11465699202 is not.

Almost surely, 2^5732849601 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

5732849601 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (3271800999).

5732849601 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.

5732849601 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The sum of its prime factors is 40111 (or 40102 counting only the distinct ones).

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 362880, while the sum is 45.

The square root of 5732849601 is about 75715.5836073394. The cubic root of 5732849601 is about 1789.7409819442.

It can be divided in two parts, 57328 and 49601, that added together give a square (106929 = 327²).

The spelling of 5732849601 in words is "five billion, seven hundred thirty-two million, eight hundred forty-nine thousand, six hundred one".