Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011111100000001… |
… | …01000101101001010 |
3 | 121112122210010221200 |
4 | 11332000220231022 |
5 | 101111210010432 |
6 | 2535544245030 |
7 | 314552065401 |
oct | 57600505512 |
9 | 17478703850 |
10 | 6409063242 |
11 | 279982708a |
12 | 12aa470776 |
13 | 7b1a6171a |
14 | 44b292638 |
15 | 2779dba7c |
hex | 17e028b4a |
6409063242 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 14617162560. Its totient is φ = 2023914600.
The previous prime is 6409063237. The next prime is 6409063247. The reversal of 6409063242 is 2423609046.
6409063242 is a `hidden beast` number, since 6 + 409 + 0 + 6 + 3 + 242 = 666.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (6409063237) and next prime (6409063247).
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 6409063197 and 6409063206.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (6409063247) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 9369634 + ... + 9370317.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (609048440).
Almost surely, 26409063242 is an apocalyptic number.
6409063242 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (8208099318).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
6409063242 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
6409063242 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 18739978 (or 18739975 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 62208, while the sum is 36.
The square root of 6409063242 is about 80056.6252224012. The cubic root of 6409063242 is about 1857.5115334577.
The spelling of 6409063242 in words is "six billion, four hundred nine million, sixty-three thousand, two hundred forty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.060 sec. • engine limits •