Search a number
-
+
821142731 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110000111100011…
…010010011001011
32010020010101001202
4300330122103023
53140203031411
6213251534415
726230412063
oct6074322313
92106111052
10821142731
11391571762
121aabba40b
13101176496
147b0b03a3
154c15183b
hex30f1a4cb

821142731 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 821142732. Its totient is φ = 821142730.

The previous prime is 821142719. The next prime is 821142767. The reversal of 821142731 is 137241128.

821142731 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-821142731 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×8211427312 = 1348550769348276722, which contains 22 as substring.

It is equal to p42177323 and since 821142731 and 42177323 have the same sum of digits, it is a Honaker prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 821142694 and 821142703.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (821142701) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 410571365 + 410571366.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (410571366).

Almost surely, 2821142731 is an apocalyptic number.

821142731 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

821142731 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

821142731 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 2688, while the sum is 29.

The square root of 821142731 is about 28655.5881286705. The cubic root of 821142731 is about 936.4247511392.

Adding to 821142731 its reverse (137241128), we get a palindrome (958383859).

The spelling of 821142731 in words is "eight hundred twenty-one million, one hundred forty-two thousand, seven hundred thirty-one".