Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11010011000110110011… |
… | …11110100101001001000 |
3 | 10012200100011001010000120 |
4 | 31030123033310221020 |
5 | 104323402434411242 |
6 | 1532310253303240 |
7 | 122335516211400 |
oct | 15143317645110 |
9 | 3180304033016 |
10 | 906695232072 |
11 | 31a588903843 |
12 | 127882494b20 |
13 | 676688b4ca6 |
14 | 31c5468b800 |
15 | 188ba1e41ec |
hex | d31b3f4a48 |
906695232072 has 192 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2797461504000. Its totient is φ = 243488052864.
The previous prime is 906695232031. The next prime is 906695232097. The reversal of 906695232072 is 270232596609.
It is a happy number.
906695232072 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2677929 + ... + 2997447.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (14570112000).
Almost surely, 2906695232072 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 906695232072, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (1398730752000).
906695232072 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (1890766271928).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
906695232072 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
906695232072 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 319688 (or 319677 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2449440, while the sum is 51.
The spelling of 906695232072 in words is "nine hundred six billion, six hundred ninety-five million, two hundred thirty-two thousand, seventy-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.086 sec. • engine limits •