Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010100101000100… |
… | …10100011100110011 |
3 | 221202011002101020121 |
4 | 21102202110130303 |
5 | 130412003203323 |
6 | 4325435351111 |
7 | 502116144016 |
oct | 112242243463 |
9 | 27664071217 |
10 | 9974662963 |
11 | 4259489a11 |
12 | 1b245b2497 |
13 | c2c688a45 |
14 | 6a8a4937d |
15 | 3d5a55a5d |
hex | 252894733 |
9974662963 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 10016051848. Its totient is φ = 9933274080.
The previous prime is 9974662927. The next prime is 9974663033. The reversal of 9974662963 is 3692664799.
9974662963 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes, and also an emirpimes, since its reverse is a distinct semiprime: 3692664799 = 613 ⋅6023923.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 9974662963 - 229 = 9437792051 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (9974669963) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 20694081 + ... + 20694562.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2504012962).
Almost surely, 29974662963 is an apocalyptic number.
9974662963 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (41388885).
9974662963 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
9974662963 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 41388884.
The product of its digits is 26453952, while the sum is 61.
The square root of 9974662963 is about 99873.2344674988. The cubic root of 9974662963 is about 2152.6135847359.
The spelling of 9974662963 in words is "nine billion, nine hundred seventy-four million, six hundred sixty-two thousand, nine hundred sixty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •