Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10010110111110000… |
… | …00010001011101010 |
3 | 222011001220220210110 |
4 | 21123320002023222 |
5 | 131222111202000 |
6 | 4353153555150 |
7 | 506031025200 |
oct | 113370021352 |
9 | 28131826713 |
10 | 10131350250 |
11 | 432997943a |
12 | 1b68b75ab6 |
13 | c55c89708 |
14 | 6c1795070 |
15 | 3e46a6850 |
hex | 25be022ea |
10131350250 has 192 divisors, whose sum is σ = 30368812032. Its totient is φ = 2240784000.
The previous prime is 10131350239. The next prime is 10131350269. The reversal of 10131350250 is 5205313101.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (21).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1134804 + ... + 1143696.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (158170896).
Almost surely, 210131350250 is an apocalyptic number.
10131350250 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 10131350250, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (15184406016).
10131350250 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (20237461782).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
10131350250 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
10131350250 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 8958 (or 8941 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 450, while the sum is 21.
Adding to 10131350250 its reverse (5205313101), we get a palindrome (15336663351).
The spelling of 10131350250 in words is "ten billion, one hundred thirty-one million, three hundred fifty thousand, two hundred fifty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •