Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011111010101000… |
… | …10111110001010101 |
3 | 1000121011200120011210 |
4 | 21331110113301111 |
5 | 133344230124322 |
6 | 4524555452033 |
7 | 525653062041 |
oct | 117524276125 |
9 | 30534616153 |
10 | 10692426837 |
11 | 45976615a4 |
12 | 20a4a57019 |
13 | 10152a77b1 |
14 | 7360c9021 |
15 | 428a8670c |
hex | 27d517c55 |
10692426837 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 14256569120. Its totient is φ = 7128284556.
The previous prime is 10692426809. The next prime is 10692426839. The reversal of 10692426837 is 73862429601.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes, and also a Blum integer, because the two primes are equal to 3 mod 4.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 10692426837 - 210 = 10692425813 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×106924268372 (a number of 21 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (10692426839) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1782071137 + ... + 1782071142.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3564142280).
Almost surely, 210692426837 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
10692426837 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (3564142283).
10692426837 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
10692426837 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 3564142282.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 870912, while the sum is 48.
The spelling of 10692426837 in words is "ten billion, six hundred ninety-two million, four hundred twenty-six thousand, eight hundred thirty-seven".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.083 sec. • engine limits •