Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110010100011100110… |
… | …1010110110000001001 |
3 | 101101020100110211022202 |
4 | 1211013031112300021 |
5 | 3234322112201201 |
6 | 121513103325545 |
7 | 10562303063354 |
oct | 1450715266011 |
9 | 341210424282 |
10 | 108568865801 |
11 | 42053326880 |
12 | 1905b5b08b5 |
13 | a312b6a136 |
14 | 537d0c929b |
15 | 2c56652c6b |
hex | 1947356c09 |
108568865801 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 121318560000. Its totient is φ = 96332129280.
The previous prime is 108568865747. The next prime is 108568865809.
108568865801 is nontrivially palindromic in base 10.
It is a cyclic number.
It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-108568865801 is a prime.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (108568865809) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 39492575 + ... + 39495323.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3791205000).
Almost surely, 2108568865801 is an apocalyptic number.
108568865801 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (11) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
108568865801 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (12749694199).
108568865801 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
108568865801 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 3329.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3686400, while the sum is 56.
It can be divided in two parts, 1085 and 68865801, that added together give a palindrome (68866886).
The spelling of 108568865801 in words is "one hundred eight billion, five hundred sixty-eight million, eight hundred sixty-five thousand, eight hundred one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •