Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011100000001111100010… |
… | …0000111100011000111111 |
3 | 1122210012010102011110001022 |
4 | 2320003320200330120333 |
5 | 3124213214043324314 |
6 | 42522355353534355 |
7 | 2443553636314262 |
oct | 270037040743077 |
9 | 48705112143038 |
10 | 12648553104959 |
11 | 4037248531822 |
12 | 150345aa143bb |
13 | 7099a43cc2a5 |
14 | 31a29c354cd9 |
15 | 16e0405c878e |
hex | b80f883c63f |
12648553104959 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 12773786304120. Its totient is φ = 12523319905800.
The previous prime is 12648553104949. The next prime is 12648553104973. The reversal of 12648553104959 is 95940135584621.
12648553104959 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 12648553104959 - 28 = 12648553104703 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (12648553104919) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 62616599429 + ... + 62616599630.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3193446576030).
Almost surely, 212648553104959 is an apocalyptic number.
12648553104959 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (125233199161).
12648553104959 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
12648553104959 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 125233199160.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 46656000, while the sum is 62.
The spelling of 12648553104959 in words is "twelve trillion, six hundred forty-eight billion, five hundred fifty-three million, one hundred four thousand, nine hundred fifty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •