Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111100101100001110… |
… | …0111100100100010011 |
3 | 110110102010112111111100 |
4 | 1321120130330210103 |
5 | 4113410222031003 |
6 | 135512452315443 |
7 | 12262526144451 |
oct | 1713034744423 |
9 | 413363474440 |
10 | 130333002003 |
11 | 503016444a6 |
12 | 21314312b83 |
13 | c3a0b88b39 |
14 | 64457cd9d1 |
15 | 35cc1e0ba3 |
hex | 1e5873c913 |
130333002003 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 196459780608. Its totient is φ = 83104200432.
The previous prime is 130333001999. The next prime is 130333002011. The reversal of 130333002003 is 300200333031.
130333002003 is a `hidden beast` number, since 130 + 3 + 330 + 0 + 200 + 3 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 130333002003 - 22 = 130333001999 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1303330020032 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (130333502003) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 4453926 + ... + 4483092.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (8185824192).
Almost surely, 2130333002003 is an apocalyptic number.
130333002003 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (66126778605).
130333002003 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
130333002003 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 50783 (or 50780 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 486, while the sum is 18.
Adding to 130333002003 its reverse (300200333031), we get a palindrome (430533335034).
The spelling of 130333002003 in words is "one hundred thirty billion, three hundred thirty-three million, two thousand, three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.080 sec. • engine limits •