Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111100111100011001… |
… | …0110001101111111001 |
3 | 110111210221112010012202 |
4 | 1321320302301233321 |
5 | 4121013123031034 |
6 | 140042354115545 |
7 | 12312135131462 |
oct | 1717062615771 |
9 | 414727463182 |
10 | 130875595769 |
11 | 5055a9531a6 |
12 | 21445b7bbb5 |
13 | c459405239 |
14 | 64978b1d69 |
15 | 360eb6e47e |
hex | 1e78cb1bf9 |
130875595769 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 149024448000. Its totient is φ = 114194755584.
The previous prime is 130875595729. The next prime is 130875595847. The reversal of 130875595769 is 967595578031.
It is a cyclic number.
It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-130875595769 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1308755957692 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (130875595729) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2860727 + ... + 2906115.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (4657014000).
Almost surely, 2130875595769 is an apocalyptic number.
130875595769 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (19) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
130875595769 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (18148852231).
130875595769 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
130875595769 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 45617.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 71442000, while the sum is 65.
The spelling of 130875595769 in words is "one hundred thirty billion, eight hundred seventy-five million, five hundred ninety-five thousand, seven hundred sixty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •