Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11000111001110101… |
… | …01100111101110001 |
3 | 1021111210010001000100 |
4 | 30130322230331301 |
5 | 204340213134330 |
6 | 10050410343013 |
7 | 652215366540 |
oct | 143472547561 |
9 | 37453101010 |
10 | 13370052465 |
11 | 5741056340 |
12 | 271172aa69 |
13 | 1350c59163 |
14 | 90b976157 |
15 | 533b9c060 |
hex | 31ceacf71 |
13370052465 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 29825482752. Its totient is φ = 5377104000.
The previous prime is 13370052431. The next prime is 13370052469. The reversal of 13370052465 is 56425007331.
13370052465 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 3 + 3 + 70 + 0 + 524 + 65 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 13370052465 - 27 = 13370052337 is a prime.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (13370052469) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 45180 + ... + 169650.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (310682112).
Almost surely, 213370052465 is an apocalyptic number.
13370052465 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (15) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
13370052465 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (16455430287).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
13370052465 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
13370052465 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 124531 (or 124528 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 75600, while the sum is 36.
Adding to 13370052465 its reverse (56425007331), we get a palindrome (69795059796).
The spelling of 13370052465 in words is "thirteen billion, three hundred seventy million, fifty-two thousand, four hundred sixty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.075 sec. • engine limits •