Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10100000100011… |
… | …00100101101100 |
3 | 102201202222001120 |
4 | 22002030211230 |
5 | 321044114022 |
6 | 24412140540 |
7 | 4112635350 |
oct | 1202144554 |
9 | 381688046 |
10 | 168348012 |
11 | 87034398 |
12 | 48467750 |
13 | 28b54411 |
14 | 18503460 |
15 | eba5d5c |
hex | a08c96c |
168348012 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 453395712. Its totient is φ = 47620800.
The previous prime is 168347953. The next prime is 168348023. The reversal of 168348012 is 210843861.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1438 + ... + 18405.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (9445744).
Almost surely, 2168348012 is an apocalyptic number.
168348012 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 168348012, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (226697856).
168348012 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (285047700).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
168348012 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
168348012 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 19958 (or 19956 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 9216, while the sum is 33.
The square root of 168348012 is about 12974.8993059677. The cubic root of 168348012 is about 552.1655799217.
The spelling of 168348012 in words is "one hundred sixty-eight million, three hundred forty-eight thousand, twelve".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.070 sec. • engine limits •