Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001000110000100111001… |
… | …11001011000111011111011 |
3 | 2121210222111101111112101121 |
4 | 10203002130321120323323 |
5 | 10110140000001121334 |
6 | 110311512334330111 |
7 | 4132644434134552 |
oct | 443023471307373 |
9 | 77728441445347 |
10 | 20000000020219 |
11 | 6410a5268124a |
12 | 22b0173659937 |
13 | b20cb82bccbb |
14 | 4d2010264d99 |
15 | 24a3a4d8bdb4 |
hex | 12309ce58efb |
20000000020219 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 21248835064560. Its totient is φ = 18788443634016.
The previous prime is 20000000020213. The next prime is 20000000020229. The reversal of 20000000020219 is 91202000000002.
It is a happy number.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 20000000020219 - 23 = 20000000020211 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×200000000202192 (a number of 27 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (20000000020211) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 9319663429 + ... + 9319665574.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2656104383070).
Almost surely, 220000000020219 is an apocalyptic number.
20000000020219 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (29) formed by its first and last digit.
20000000020219 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1248835044341).
20000000020219 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
20000000020219 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 18639329069.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 72, while the sum is 16.
The spelling of 20000000020219 in words is "twenty trillion, twenty thousand, two hundred nineteen".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.079 sec. • engine limits •