Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101101100001010100111011… |
… | …101001100100010110111111 |
3 | 222020212011011022002000110011 |
4 | 231201110323221210112333 |
5 | 202220103313144233043 |
6 | 1545443401103124051 |
7 | 60112065623214004 |
oct | 5541247351442677 |
9 | 866764138060404 |
10 | 200202311321023 |
11 | 58877361528210 |
12 | 1a554670ba3627 |
13 | 8792cc63b811b |
14 | 3761bb4a7d8ab |
15 | 1822ac53be59d |
hex | b6153ba645bf |
200202311321023 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 225956675007360. Its totient is φ = 175708252792800.
The previous prime is 200202311320997. The next prime is 200202311321029. The reversal of 200202311321023 is 320123113202002.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 200202311321023 - 221 = 200202309223871 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 200202311320985 and 200202311321003.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (200202311321029) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 28854465 + ... + 35113882.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (14122292187960).
Almost surely, 2200202311321023 is an apocalyptic number.
200202311321023 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (25754363686337).
200202311321023 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
200202311321023 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 63978198.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 864, while the sum is 22.
Adding to 200202311321023 its reverse (320123113202002), we get a palindrome (520325424523025).
The spelling of 200202311321023 in words is "two hundred trillion, two hundred two billion, three hundred eleven million, three hundred twenty-one thousand, twenty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.084 sec. • engine limits •