Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11011101100101000… |
… | …010100000111110011 |
3 | 2211202121200010010100 |
4 | 123230220110013303 |
5 | 441401341414211 |
6 | 21355015003443 |
7 | 2101660041330 |
oct | 335450240763 |
9 | 84677603110 |
10 | 29739794931 |
11 | 11681380120 |
12 | 591b969583 |
13 | 2a5c4bb6c2 |
14 | 1621a73987 |
15 | b90d7b156 |
hex | 6eca141f3 |
29739794931 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 53557380864. Its totient is φ = 15449243760.
The previous prime is 29739794899. The next prime is 29739794933. The reversal of 29739794931 is 13949793792.
29739794931 is a `hidden beast` number, since 2 + 9 + 73 + 9 + 79 + 493 + 1 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 29739794931 - 25 = 29739794899 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×297397949312 (a number of 22 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (63).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (29739794933) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 23 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 21456591 + ... + 21457976.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2231557536).
Almost surely, 229739794931 is an apocalyptic number.
29739794931 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (21) formed by its first and last digit.
29739794931 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (23817585933).
29739794931 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
29739794931 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 42914591 (or 42914588 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 23147208, while the sum is 63.
The spelling of 29739794931 in words is "twenty-nine billion, seven hundred thirty-nine million, seven hundred ninety-four thousand, nine hundred thirty-one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.087 sec. • engine limits •