Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1000110000101010000… |
… | …00010001010001011001 |
3 | 1001202221012210112011000 |
4 | 10120111000101101121 |
5 | 14412422011244001 |
6 | 350135540455213 |
7 | 30514030442463 |
oct | 4302500212131 |
9 | 1052835715130 |
10 | 301000103001 |
11 | 106720790504 |
12 | 4a4043aa509 |
13 | 224cc0a3930 |
14 | 107d5cb9133 |
15 | 7c6a3b0a86 |
hex | 4615011459 |
301000103001 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 480426186240. Its totient is φ = 185154422400.
The previous prime is 301000102973. The next prime is 301000103011. The reversal of 301000103001 is 100301000103.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 301000103001 - 25 = 301000102969 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×3010001030012 (a number of 24 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (9).
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (301000103011) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 681136 + ... + 1032446.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (15013318320).
Almost surely, 2301000103001 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
301000103001 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (179426083239).
301000103001 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
301000103001 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 353774 (or 353768 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 9, while the sum is 9.
Adding to 301000103001 its reverse (100301000103), we get a palindrome (401301103104).
The spelling of 301000103001 in words is "three hundred one billion, one hundred three thousand, one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •