Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101101111010100011111… |
… | …01010011010011001000101 |
3 | 10221222100120120100011012200 |
4 | 12313222033222122121011 |
5 | 12430003123304020401 |
6 | 144131431314105113 |
7 | 6235555341352356 |
oct | 667521752323105 |
9 | 127870516304180 |
10 | 30213210220101 |
11 | 9699394570127 |
12 | 347b632b7b199 |
13 | 13b212a5551bc |
14 | 766481ab9d2d |
15 | 375dacd77686 |
hex | 1b7a8fa9a645 |
30213210220101 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 43662457969728. Its totient is φ = 20132376615144.
The previous prime is 30213210220079. The next prime is 30213210220117. The reversal of 30213210220101 is 10102201231203.
30213210220101 is a `hidden beast` number, since 3 + 0 + 21 + 321 + 0 + 220 + 101 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 30213210220101 - 221 = 30213208122949 is a prime.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (30213210220001) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 813608035 + ... + 813645168.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (3638538164144).
Almost surely, 230213210220101 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
30213210220101 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (13449247749627).
30213210220101 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
30213210220101 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1627255272 (or 1627255269 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 144, while the sum is 18.
Adding to 30213210220101 its reverse (10102201231203), we get a palindrome (40315411451304).
The spelling of 30213210220101 in words is "thirty trillion, two hundred thirteen billion, two hundred ten million, two hundred twenty thousand, one hundred one".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.082 sec. • engine limits •